The Symposium seeks to share experience that will lead to an improvement in the quality of environmental adjudication on environment and natural resource cases in Asian jurisdictions and improving access to environmental justice. To do so, it will
Representatives from courts and civil society in Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, the People’s Republic of China, the Philippines, the United States, and Thailand, will share cutting edge experiences on the evolution of environmental jurisprudence and adjudication in their respective jurisdictions. Their sharing will be supported by key development partners including the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United States Environmental Protection Agency, The Access Initiative, and the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
This two‐day workshop of over 100 participants will build on the ongoing work of ADB under a regional technical assistance which seeks to improve implementation of environmental law in selected Asian countries by developing a roadmap for institutionalizing a system to strengthen the capacity of judges to apply environmental and natural resources law and regulation.
The symposium’s emphasis is improving environmental and natural resource decision making and adjudication within regional judiciaries, without assuming that any particular form or structure is the best way to achieve effective environmental decision‐making and adjudication in different country contexts. It will highlight environmental specialization within general courts, as well as exploring work done by specialist environmental courts, boards, and tribunals. Importantly, without drivers for increasing the demand for effective environmental judicial decision‐making from the judiciary, environmental judicial specializations could go unused. Hence, the symposium will look at demand‐side drivers, which will include the role of civil society in creating this demand, and also looking at other ways to institutionalize access to environmental justice in developing Asia.
udges and key stakeholders will be asked to share their experiences in environmental adjudication and also, the challenges and needs that arise in doing their work. Given the many relevant issues, this year, the Symposium will emphasize an understanding of the drivers that led or are leading to progressive environmental jurisprudence and environmental adjudication, rather than focusing on specific technical legal issues. It will also seek to identify the ways of improving Asian judicial decision‐making and education to emphasize environmental and natural resource issues, the concrete needs of judges and other key stakeholders in building capacity to do so, and concrete actions to respond in those ways and to those needs. Judges and environmental officials will also discuss their need for further capacity building and whether an Asia Pacific Judges’ Network on the Environment should be established in conjunction with development partners to serve as forum for further capacity building and information exchange.
The papers submitted during the conference will be recorded in an edited volume to serve as reference on regional and international environmental adjudication, including ECTs, to inform further work on environmental adjudication in Asia and the Pacific. To achieve this purpose, the first draft of papers will be needed by 21 July 2010.
Welcome Reception, EDSA Shangri‐la Hotel, hosted by Bindu N. Lohani, Vice-President (Finance and Administration), Asian Development Bank (ADB)
Welcome Remarks
Session 1: Judicial Innovation in Environmental Law: Landmark Cases
Session Chair: Neric Acosta, Secretary General, Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats
Coffee Break
Session 2: Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law
Session Chair: Wanhua Yang, Officer in Charge, Environmental Law in Asia‐Pacific, UNEP
Lunch
Executive Dining Room Coffee Lounge, hosted by Daniele Ponzi, Lead Environment Specialist, Regional and Sustainable Development Department, ADB
Session 3: Evolution of Judicial Specialization in Environment Law
Session Chair: Vivien Rosa Ratnawati, Assistant Deputy Minister, Ministry of Environment, Indonesia
Session 4: Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law
Session Chair: Patricia Moore, Head, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Regional Environmental Law Programme
Photo Session and Reception,Mezzanine ADB Cafeteria
Video Message from Antonio Benjamin, Justice, Superior Tribunal de Justica (High Court of Brazil) on “The Role of the Judiciary in Protecting the Environment”
Session 5: Trans‐Judicial Networks for the Environment
Session Chair: Milag Ballesteros, Secretariat, Asian Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Network (AECEN)
Session 6: Judicial Specialization in Environmental Law
Session Chair: Robert Ward, Regional Counsel, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Session 7: International Experience in Environmental Boards and Tribunals
Session Chair: Nessim J. Ahmad, Director, Environment and Safeguards Division concurrently Practice Leader (Environment), ADB
Session 8: Institutionalizing Systems for Promoting Environmental Law in Judicial Education
Session Chair: Kathie Stein, Judge, U.S. Environmental Appeals Board
Break‐out Groups on Challenges of Environmental Decision Making
Download full Program Agenda for details of parallel breakout sessions
Session Chair: Kala Mulqueeny, Senior Counsel,Office of the General Counsel, ADB
Session 13: Asian Judges and the Environment: Capacity Needs and Potential for a Network? Panel Discussion: Asian Courts Views: Brief Reflections (5 minutes each)
Session Chair: Hamid L. Sharif, Principal Director, Central Operations Services Office, ADB
Concluding Thoughts from Development Partners (5 minutes)
Closing
Jeremy H. Hovland, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, ADB
Program Agenda
Concept Note
Background Paper
Speech by Liu Ming
Presentation by Antonio Oposa